"Nintendo of America needs to STFU"

[Mummelmann]

KungKras said:

Manos said:

KungKras said:

 

You do not decide what quality is. Many people would not consider the HD console libraries to be quality.

But anyways, perhaps another example is needed: The Wii innovated in gameplay. The HD consoles innovated in media functions on consoles. The Wii is clearly more about the games. I really thought that this is a commonly accepted fact. Sadly I was wrong.

Yeah, I bet it really makes you sad when people don't love the wii like you do. But hey, now I am starting to get you! When Natal comes out you will start giving MS some love since it is more "innovative" than the wiimote. Cool.

I don't decide but the minority of the people who bought current gen consoles will? (48,9%?) How about metascores?

Guess what? Many people would not consider wii library to be quality.

Natal is only about the hardware so far, the Wiimote was from day one about the software that could implement it. As I said the Wii is more about the games.

Many people would consider it quality too, so you saying what is quality and what is not isn't convincing. And looking at software sold, we reach the same conclusion again. Wii is more about the games than the PS lites.

So, bascially, he's wrong and you're right? Do you decide what quality is more than he does? Do game sales decide quality? Why not take scores into account? That would be the closest thing to a quality measure, but then your argument on quality and Nintendo's apparent (in your opinion) extreme prowess in it would be null and void since they happen to have the lowest rated game library on average. Do you feel that the PS2 had the best quality library simply because it sold the most and had the biggest installed base? I bet you don't.

I realize you two are in a disagreement but I just don't understand this way of arguing, it holds no merit. "I don't like Nintendo, so their games are not the best." vs. "I like Nintendo so their games are the best." Groundbreaking stuff right there.