Valve has no plans working on the PS3.

[Kantor]

Nizut76 said:

Kantor said:

Nizut76 said:
I didnt research i was hoping the box would say this game sucks if you dont have high speed internet.

I would have thought somebody informed enough to be posting on a video game forum is informed enough to not buy a game without any kind of research. It's not like this is some no-name game, either. It's a pretty well known fact that it's a co-operative FPS.

Yeah maybe i should have been more informed. but the other 95% of people who play games that dont go on video game forums what about them. Screw them they should have got on VG charts. I'll start spreading the word to every adult with kids that play games to become a member of VG charts before they buy any more games. Most people expect a decent single player mode. Unless it specifically says multiplayer only. like warhawk. I like blasting zombies. but i also like a story mode when a game doesnt specifically say its meant to be a co-operative game. I was just on the left 4 dead website and no where does it say this is meant to be a co-operative game, but i guess the games website would be a terrible place to research a game. It says it has single player, multiplayer, and co-op but never mentions it was meant to be played as co-operative.

If you buy a game without knowing about it first, then you have no right to complain about a feature of the game that is common knowledge. If somebody buys Left 4 Dead expecting a story-based single player experience, too bad for them. They should have bought Half Life or BioShock. Valve has no obligation to state "best with co-operative play" on the box. Just looking at the back of the box, can't you tell that it's a co-op game?