Barozi said:
At first I though you quoted him, because it's not a franchise (yet) Still I found Bad Company to be superior to Killzone 2, CoD3 and World at War. Also do I have to remind you that you can also carry only one real gun in KZ2.
http://ps3.pspfreak.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/battlefield-bad-company-20070905104907805.jpg http://mediang.gameswelt.net/public/images/200805/e3f7a70d7fc6cf002d3fe25a633606cb.jpg |
That's a good point.
You can only carry one primary weapon in Killzone 2, yes, but they don't fill the game with all manner of useless weapons that you can't tell the difference between! Plus, in Killzone 2, you have a pistol, and your grenades are separate from your gun. I just didn't like the way Bad Company handled the genre. I'll admit it tried to be different, but not in a good way, IMO.
Don't tell me the graphics are beautiful. No screenshot can convince me of that, because I've played the game in HD, and it just doesn't compare to the best graphics (KZ2, Uncharted, MGS4), or even the better graphics (CoD4, Arkham Asylum, BioShock), on PS3. It doesn't look bad as such, if it were a PS2 game, it would look phenomenal. But relative to its competition, it's hideous. Even Halo 3 looks better, and it doesn't run in 720p.
EDIT: Saw the screenshot. I don't think that's the game I own, because that's miles better than what I've seen. Or it's excessively touched up, like most screenshots.







