By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KungKras said:
Kantor said:
KungKras said:
Kantor said:
I don't think Kotick did this. Blizzard aren't about to let some corporate bigwig boss them around.

I really hope that's the case, because I'm getting pretty worried about the desicions that they are taking with SC2, and if this was true, it would make me about ten times more worried.

Actually, I want to think Kotick did this, because the alternative is that Blizzard did it themselves.

We don't know Battlenet 2.0 will be paid, anyway.

As things are now, the game is being split, and there is nothing to do about it.

My reasoning is that if Blizzard decided to split it, then maybe they actually have a grand vision that needs three games. And if they cut out LAN, they actually think they can compensate with Bnet2.0. And I really hope it won't be paid.

But if Kotick is behind it, I really fear about the quality of the game when it comes out. That's why I don't want Kotick to be behind it.

That's a good point. If Blizz did it, it was to make an awesome game. If Kotick did it, it was to make more money.

Why does Bobby Kotick think he rules the world now that his company owns Blizzard? He was quiet back when he just had Spiderman, Tony Hawk, CoD and Guitar Hero, but now he has WoW, he suddenly rules the world?



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective