NightDragon83 said:
I was unaware that making a completely logical point was the equivalent of trolling. PS3 owners are always citing having to pay for XBL as the main reason why they prefer PSN, and they also use that point to justify the higher price point of the PS3 by saying that it makes up the difference in price between the 2 systems over the long run if you factor in paying for an XBL Gold membership. All I did was point out that fact in my post but from an opposing point of view, saying that if you're willing to drop an extra $100-$200 up front for a more expensive system because it has "free" online, then what's the big deal with spending an extra $50 max a year for XBL? |
That $200 dollars that they are making up is on a yearly basis, so it doesn't hurt nearly as much as paying upfront. This is the reason it is such a sad argument. Microsoft dropped the price of the 360 and gave gamers opportunities to get their hands on their favorite titles at a fraction of what the cost should've been. The catch was the HD and a yearly service. I have no problem with that. I had a huge problem with Kaz Hirai telling me to get a second job and work the extra hours just to buy a god damn videogame system. That is proof that the head of Sony don't give a shit about the consumers.







