CGI-Quality said:
Kantor said:
CGI-Quality said:
leo-j said:
Ha thats great, but they are loosing the ps3 audience with there recent acts, first off the COD4 servers have been hacked and you cant play cod4 without getting cheated off, secondly they threathen sony for a price cut... oh and lets not forget raising the price of there games just beause they know people are going to buy it even if its more costly to buy a certain edition than a PS2 console..
honestly PS3 gamers should not be happy with activision.. I myself have never been happy with them, as they only ride off the guitar hero and Call of duty franchises, the rest of the games they make are mediocrity at best..
Ive never been happy about EA either for just porting horrible ports to the ps3, but I see that has changed.. but still Ive not see an an innovative quality title from EA other than Mirror's edge.
|
What were your impressions of Burnout Paradise and Dead Space? I felt those were both quality titles from them. Also, did you play either Skate games, they too were good games. I actually think EA has done better this gen than most other gens to be honest.
|
I haven't played Dead Space, but Burnout Paradise was far from innovative. It moved in completely the wrong direction. What kind of racing game doesn't have splitscreen?
|
I didn't mention the word "innovative" in my response for a reason, I don't think it was too innovative either. However, it IS a quality title, which is why it's mentioned.
|
Well, Mirror's Edge was certainly innovative (quality is, of course, subjective, and I'm not a fan). I do indeed think that Paradise and Dead Space are quality games, and DS was pretty innovative too. Bad Company was quality, as well, and pretty innovative with the destructible environments thing (though I'm sure it's been done in some form before- I believe Red Faction had it, and Red Faction: Guerilla handled destructible environments much better IMO).
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
