Is The PS3 Worthy Of Been Called King Of The Consoles?

[Kantor]

Final-Fan said:

Kantor said:

Final-Fan said:

Procrastinato said:

If I got to take one console to a desert island with me, where I would stay for the rest of my days...

(A) Console never breaks, and power is not a concern.

(B) Cost of the console, and any media is not a concern.

(C) You get all the games the console can play, any music it can play, and any movie it can play.

(D) Online play is free, even if there is "usually" a charge, and the connection is top-notch.

60GB launch PS3, easily. No other console even comes close. Even if the movies and music didn't come to the island, it would still be the 60GB PS3.  If there was a king, in the gamer's eyes... that'd be it, I think.

Strange question, though.

The combined PS1/PS2/PS3 library, along with PSN ...
vs.
The combined GC/Wii library, along with WiiWare AND VIRTUAL CONSOLE!!!

If you don't count movies, which the Wii can't play, are you so sure?  

Yup, I would take the first option.

I'm not going to lie.  Losing Final Fantasy (mostly) would hurt real, real bad.  And there are plenty of other games I'd miss.  

But Virtual Console is just massive.  Many of the best games from all Nintendo's systems; and some from Sega, Neo Geo, TG16 ...

And Wikipedia lists Final Fantasy (I) as an upcoming release.  So there's hope!   

Final Fantasy 1 is on the PSN, but only in Japanese. Along with FF2, FF Tactics and FF7 (which is, of course, in English as well).

How complete is Virtual Console? I thought it only had ~20 games per past system?