Soma said:
outlawauron said:
Soma said: 7.5 in lasting appeal? Wii Sports is still played by a lot of people and this gets 7.5? It's clear there's a problem with reviewers nowadays.
Lack of online? So what.... you can say IGN is reviewing for their "hardcore audience", but some days ago there was a poll on IGN that asked about online gaming on the Wii, and "didn't care at all" had more votes. It seems IGN doesn't know their own reader's tastes. |
Are you kidding? They're not reviewing for a hardcore audience because they penalize it for lack of online. They wouldn't be doing readers justice for not taking a feature that should already be mandatory in all multiplayer games.
And I imagine that Wii owners would have voted "didn't care at all" because the major games don't put a whole lot of effort into their online offerings.
|
Mandatory to whom? And maybe the readers voted for that because they really don't care at all and prefer an offline multiplayer?
|
You should have an option to do both.
Online gaming is a feature that every console and handheld supports and it's ridicoulous and entirely lazy for a developer to not include online mutliplayer for a multiplayer based game. Your post really shows how bad it is.
You'd hope as gaming grows that they'd be able to include very basic features found in their compeitition.