IGN Wii guys thanked in the Conduit's credits. Possible bias in review?

[theRepublic]

jlauro said:

dsister44 said:

jlauro said:

Ari_Gold said:

Nintendogamer said:

Ari_Gold said:
yeah pretty much, i wrote this a week ago, this makes the ign review look unprofessional, and its too much of a coincidence that ign gave the conduit the highest rating....

Nope IGN has given the 3rd highest, worth playing has given the 2nd highest. Bigbag has given the highest, they gave it Grade S which is more than 9/10

what type of credibility do those sites have?

More then the two sites that gave it a 4/10 in my book.

Why? because you do not agree with their reviews? That is a awesome reason why not to like a reviewer.

Exactly.  It's not just because I don't agree with the score which would be less awsome of a reason, but because of the reveiw itself.  Their review has little basis in reality, and contains out right lies,  If they clearly can not do this review half way credibly, that is a major blow to their credibility for all their reviews.  They are less trust worthy then some reveiwer I know nothing about.

I agree and would add more to that.

If your tastes differ wildly from the tastes of a reviewer, why would you like that reviewer?  You wouldn't.  Their reviews would be worthless to you.