| kowenicki said: @lombard those are still massively different to what vgc has arent they?.. |
VGC, it's ioi, it's not me. Only ioi can speak about the number of vgc.
I don't know the number of vgc in the begin of the year, but if they are not in correlation with the real number of chart-track in the begin of the year, which is not easy to know because we have the same problem of precision with all the number of chart track, it can explain with the number of end june too, a part of the problem you certainly want to speak.
To resume, if the number of vgc in the begin of the year are already not the same of chart track in the begin of the year, it's normal that it's not the case at the end of june, even if the number of vgc between january and june are not so different with the number given by chart track.
Example:
I take the wii. Imagine, that the chart track number for the wii in the begin of 2009 is 4,86m and the number at the end of june 5,44m. So for chart track, the number for the wii in the begin of the year (january to june) is 580,000.
I don't know the number of vgc, but if it's 700,000 for the begin of the year, if they have 4,94m in the begin of 2009, they obtain 5,64m at the end of june.
So, for you, you can see a difference of 200,000 in LTD at the end of june for vgc and chart track, but for the period there is only a difference of 120,000.
So we must see all the number with precision before say vgc is not in correlation with chart track.
And as i said before, it's only ioi which can say if his number are good or not.
