RVDondaPC said:
That's not how mergers work. Mergers don't always have to do with the "higher ups" of the companies being merged. It has more to do with the ownership of the company. Mergers mean the share holders of the two previous companies share the ownership of the new company, not necessarily the task of running the new company. Generally the merged company will take management from the different companies as they want the best executives, some older executives choose to leave the new company, or the company may just require more managers as it is bigger now. But that is not always the case. Regardless of the situation what makes something a merger is the sharing of ownership, not a promise to bring on the old company's board of directors. Anyways it seems to me that the merger would just be the distribution arm of the two companies not a complete merger. Sounds more like a partnership than a merger, and it's definitely not a take over like some people seem to think. |
no shit... this is not a business class so I was aiming for general simple answer. This is why I said "can put on..." so that it shows that they new or merged company has then option of taking in or letting managers leave. This merger won't result in a new company though. It will still be Sony Pictures.
When shareholders get the option to buy stock created from the merger the company with the higher percentage of ownership typically has its shareholders buy-up a lot of the old company's stocks.










