kowenicki said:
Poor analogy and rather meaningless in this context |
Well then.. try this one on for size.
Why is it that "lower sales"-improvements is the same as "getting stronger". While "not on par with previous high sales" is "losing"?
Year 1 360 sells 2.3m, PS3 sells 2.4m
Year 2 360 sells 3.4m, PS3 sells 4.7m
Year 3 360 sells 4.1m, PS3 sells 3.7m
So why is it that the 360 by default is "going strong", while PS3 is "losing"? When the total adds up to 9.8m vs 10.8m?
So if the 360 should end up on 3.9 next period, is it the same as "losing", or a "nose dive"? And if the PS3 sells 3.9 next period, would that be equal to "going stronger" since it improved their last result?
| 2007 | 2008 | 2008 v 2007 | % up/down | |||
| 360 | 2,307,899 | 3,414,461 | 1,106,562 | 47.95% | ||
| Wii | 5,657,811 | 8,973,330 | 3,315,519 | 58.60% | ||
| PS3 | 2,441,854 | 4,713,050 | 2,271,196 | 93.01% | ||
| Total | 10,407,564 | 17,100,841 | 6,693,277 | 64.31% | ||
| 2008 | 2009 | 2009 v 2008 | % up/down | |||
| 360 | 3,414,461 | 4,110,033 | 695,572 | 20.37% | ||
| Wii | 8,973,330 | 7,786,011 | -1,187,319 | -13.23% | ||
| PS3 | 4,713,050 | 3,721,601 | -991,449 | -21.04% |







