Words Of Wisdom said:
I'm saying that the budget doesn't matter. Tales of games don't have an art-style that relies on expensive CGI and the like. I'm also saying that your statement of "mothership" is immaterial as "Tales of" doesn't have a strong franchise name. A strong franchise name is like Final Fantasy where the mere words on the box are enough to move software. Tales doesn't have that however Tales of Symphonia 2 had the benefit of being a sequel: an existing fanbase. Essentially, I'm saying that being a direct sequel to a reasonably successful RPG with minor brand name is a better position than being a mid-high budget game with a minor brand name. A sequel has immediate exposure whereas the virtue of being mid-high budget does not. |
Nope. Sorry Im just gonna have to disagree. I know what youre trying to say about Sypmphonia being the recognizable name but I dont buy it. Tales of is Tales of. The series has 1 million fanbase not just Symphonia.







