Rath on 13 October 2007
| MontanaHatchet said: I'm trying to thaw the basic idea here. The Wii is better being vastly weaker than the other systems. And if the Wii shouldn't be compared to the other systems, why do most of us do it? It's complete hypocritical! Oh, the Wii is selling the most, but it's on a completely different playing field. Thus, the 360 is selling the most. Or maybe the DS? But considering that the DS is cheap and it's expanded the bounds of controls, perhaps it's on a different playing field as well. What if Sony made a console much like the Wii, and Nintendo decided to follow Sony's route, making a powerful system but keeping the same control? Most of you (but I'm not pointing fingers) would still go to Nintendo's side. Perhaps he's thinking to himself, "Hey, imagine if we could couple the power of the PS3 or 360, with the controls of the Wii." "We could make amazing games!" Perhaps he really does just hate the Wii, and he just wants to mock is so that fanboys on chat rooms all over the world can insult a man they know nothing about. That seems like the most logical theory, because, much like most of your opinions, mine were complete crap. ~MontanaHatchet~ |
The point isnt that Nintendos direction for this generation was to produce a cheaper less powerful system rather than an expensive powerful one and this guy is saying 'Hey if they made an expensive powerful sytem it would be pretty good!'.
Hes saying that the Wii would be good if it wasnt the Wii, and thats why hes being mocked.
