How would you feel if someone gave Killzone2 a 7 without seeing multiplayer

[Carl]

vaio said:

Carl2291 said:

vaio said:

Carl2291 said:
He basicly says the game looks like crap... and to be honest, its not exactly the best looking Wii game (although it makes Golden Eye look like SMB)

Black on PS2 looks better than it imo.

And, not to mension 5hours 13 minutes to beat it... on his first time through, is rather shocking. People were complaining about Terminator: Salvation, why not about this?

Maybe because thats not what we have issues with?

 

You have issues with some guy from the internet, because of his opinion of the game.

Seriously, you are complaining about the review... but with the actual state the review is in... id be happy with the 7, as it should be much lower.

You should really look into some reading comprehesion classes, I stated i have no problem with the number ha assigned, I am actually suprised it got that good grade considering what he wrote and that he didnt even try the full game and he skipped the cutscenes while giving the story a bad review and so on.

Again my biggest problem is this part here:

I'm not sure who I should blame for The Conduit's shortcomings. Do I blame the developer for making a rather generic shooter with a convoluted storyline that isn't as epic or mysterious as it wants to be or do I blame Nintendo for creating a console whose lack of hardware power essentially handcuffs every developer who tries to create a "next-gen" game for it?

Maybe i missed that bit, but it IS 2am here, so i have an excuse. And no, i dont need reading comprehension classes.

Sure, its a really bad review... but at the end of the day, hes a reviewer... for a big(ish) magazine/site, and its his opinion of the game.

He might troll a bit on the Wii-mote and the Wii... but if he thinks that the game could have been better, if not on the Wii... then thats what he thinks.

All this complaining about it is really un-necessary... as its only a small review, for what seems to be a mediocre game.