Announcing Sonic to appease those angry about the delay?

[BenKenobi88]

KruzeS said:

BenKenobi88 said:

Any smart Smash fan wouldn't be that fooled though. Sonic in the game is great news, a bit expected, but still great...but a 2 month delay sucks for the gamers any way you put it...you just gotta bear through it.

Bear right? It's not bare...but I don't mean the one with claws or the nude one...man English confuses me sometimes...and it's my primary language...

"Bear with me" vs. "bare with me": http://wsu.edu/~brians/errors/bare.html (don't say this last one to a guy... or at least make sure you'd really want that... hehe)

About Brawl, the delay may piss you off, I get that. But if a delay is what it takes to make the game right, isn't it all for the better? Imagine there's a framerate issue (e.g.), and a couple of months is enough to fix it for good. You'll be playing Brawl for years to come, what's two months?

Yes, that's the argument people always bring up. And yes, I would rather wait 2 extra months than have a crappy game, but what kind of choice is that?

Let's say your game of choice comes out in a few weeks...but then they announce a half year delay.  Would you complain?  You shouldn't, because you wouldn't want a gimped version!  A year?  They need all the time they can get, right?  All I'm saying is, yeah, they need extra time to make it perfect...but Nintendo with its money-printing systems should have been able to get it done.

*I* would rather have the finished, perfect game on December 3rd...that's what I was expecting. OF COURSE I wouldn't want a gimped version...but is it wrong to be mad that they couldn't get it done on time? I will wait...I just am a bit disappointed that they couldn't work faster after promising us a 2007 date.