errorrrr said:
Soundwave said:
PullusPardus said:
i say port MGS Rising instead of Peace Walker,
Peace walker is designed for handhelds.
but the Wii seriously need to stop getting ports , its like " THE port gaming console " |
See this is where I think people get it wrong.
Why the hell would I want to play a vastly downgraded version of MGS Rising on the Wii? Was Dead Rising Wii any good?
PSP ports are fine though as long as the game is good, because it can be enhanced on the Wii greatly.
Look at Silent Hill on Wii vs. PSP. Who would rather play the PSP version? No one. The PSP version might as well not exist, the Wii version is better in virtually every way.
To me it's no different from the PS3/360 getting ports of each other's games.
As long as they're NEW games ... that's my criteria. I don't want ports of games that are 1/2/3/4 year old PS2 or even 360 or PS3 games.
If they going to do something like MGS: Peace Walker day and date on Wii + PSP like Silent Hill ... what's wrong with that? It's not much different from devs releasing PS3/360 versions of new games on the same day, except in this case the Wii would get the better version.
It would be a brand new Metal Gear game for the Wii, who cares if a version with lesser graphics and worse control is on the PSP? I'll take it. Ditto for Kingdom Hearts: Birth By Sleep, which Square-Enix is honestly stupid if they don't put that on Wii because it would sell more on the Wii than PSP.
|
Not if Square-Enix is thinking of Ad-Hoc Local player which is huge in Japan. Look at Monster Hunter on the PSP...
|
And that's fine. For Japan. In North America and Europe, KH on Wii would destroy KH on PSP. And it wouldn't do badly on the Wii in Japan either.
Better graphics, better control, ability to play on a much bigger screen, potential to add some Wiimote or WM+ stuff where its sensible, etc.
In either case, S-E would easily double the sales of the game if they were to do this (probably even more than that honestly).
