Who think MadWorld would have sold better on other consoles?

[tuoyo]

tolu619 said:

RolStoppable said:
MadWorld would have definitely sold better on the 360 or PS3, because on either system there isn't much of a choice when it comes to bloody action games. Owners of the HD consoles are starved for that kind of game, so they would even buy a short low budget title like MadWorld in huge numbers, simply due to the lack of alternatives on their machines.

I'll have 2 disagree with that.They have Ninja Gaiden 2(and 2 sigma),Devil May Cry and stuff like Heavenly Sword.Gears is also gory though its a shooter,not a hacker.But let's face it,it might have sold less on HD consoles.Nintendo gamers are usually more willing to try new stuff than HD gamers.  Not every HD gamer is a core gamer.Many of them are 'casuals' by my book.My definition of casual isn't girly or babish,because some babish games are hardcore,my definition of casual is the typical stereotype boy in my country.They don't LOVE games like I do.They play Soccer(for 90% of their game time),GTA,driving games,DMC & GOW and war games.

Well there you go that was the exact definition of casual before this gen.  Many PS2 owners only owned Pro Evolution and would buy it every single year when the new version was released.  Many of those folk have now graduated to the PS3 and do the same.  Buy Pro Evo 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and nothing else.  Or only GT1, GT2, GT3, GT4.  Or only GTA1, GTA2, GTA3, etc.  However, this gen the definition of casual changed.  It was changed by the HD fanboys who were looking for a way to put down the sales of Wii.  So GTA froma super casual game (which is why it sold so much - and mostly to teenage boys who wanted to feel cool) suddenly this gen became the definition of hard core since that game and other similar games were not going to be on Wii.  Now HD fanboys can say hardcore games don't sell on Wii despite the fact Zelda and Brawl are a million times more hardcore than Pro Evo, GTA, COD, etc.