A possible reason why third parties prefer non Nintendo consoles

[MaxwellGT2000]

mjc2021 said:

MaxwellGT2000 said:

mjc2021 said:
@ MaxwellGT2000
Cherry picking? The only game I left off that list was Sonic & Mario because it had a 1st party franchise and was even published by Nintendo in Japan. I left out the bundled 360 games for obvious reasons as well.


I did a pretty good job showing crap games top the Wii 3rd party charts as well. You said that's being subjective but I don't see those games in your collection or Rol's either.

"I don't see those games in your collections so they must be crap and I'm proving my point blah blah"

Uhm I don't buy every game I play, many of the chart toppers like Rayman Raving Rabbids are pretty awesome, same as Mario and Sonic, I've contemplated many times picking it up, I love Lego Star Wars, and Tiger Woods on Wii has become my favorite sports game.  Do I own them no?  Will I eventually if I had more cash after I buy a 360 to finish my console collection?  I most certainly will.

Oddly enough the games you do drop money on are considered the best but you ignore the best sellers. I'm merely pointing out when it comes to 3rd party on the Wii mediocre games are king but the quality titles YOU would buy don't top the charts.

With that said I'd be willing to add Mario & Sonic on the list of top selling 3rd party games. Because it further proves my point crap is king on the Wii.

Amazing, you're trying to get your point across to me by trolling.  Which I suspect was your intentions all along but just now shown your motives, good job.