By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BxN said:
deathgod33 said:
halo 3 is just plain and simple, a better fps than killzone 2

Terrible analysis. Sales have nothing to do with quality. Considering how Halo 3 is one of the best selling games of all time, it makes perfect sense for it to continue selling well even a year and a half after it's launch. I mean, even GTA: San Andreas is still selling good for ps2.

On the other hand, Killzone 2 is a sequel from a relatively unknown game that's struggling a bit in America, the ps3's weakest turf.

 

All that is well and good, however:

2. Playstation 3: Killzone 2 (2009) 91
Sony Computer Entertainment America

1. Xbox 360: Halo 3 (2007) 94
Microsoft

So,

A. Critics/Reviews

B. Consumers preference

C. Legs

D. Popularity online

...all land significantly(VASTLY) on the side of Halo 3.

Thus, while many don't agree with his opinion, it certainly is a popular one...well, maybe not on this site, but everywhere else it is.

What are we supposed to accept? The quantifiable opinions of everyone in the gaming industry, or the obviously jaded arguments of a message forum with a huge Sony fanbase.

I'm not saying which game is "better." However, I do claim that his opinion is as valid as anyones.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.