By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MontanaHatchet said:
outlawauron said:
MontanaHatchet said:
outlawauron said:
SmokedHostage said:
 

BD has a metacritic score of 79 while LO has the metacritic score of 78.

Also I was wrong about the best selling game on 360.

That's absolutely criminal.

I don't see what's so criminal about average games getting average scores.

1. Relative to one another, Lost Odyssey is a better game than Blue Dragon in nearly every way.

2. Lost Odyssey is so far from average.

1. Blue Dragon has better gameplay, which pretty much negates any advantage Lost Odyssey has.

2. The only good or above average thing I see in Lost Odyssey is the story. It's pretty good, and the dream sequences are fantastic. But everything else is "meh." Music is OKAY, graphics are OKAY, and the gameplay is just boring. I mean, Chrono Trigger had a more complex battle system nearly 15 years ago. Point is, LO is kind of like Final Fantasy 7 in that it's very overrated, but different in that FF7 was actually a good game that was fun to play.

How is a charge meter better than the target rings and skill link system?

I thought Uematsu did a fantastic job, and I loved the gameplay. They made the battles pretty cinematic for a turn based system.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.