Sony did with PS3 what history told it not to do.

[outlawauron]

Majin-Tenshinhan said:

outlawauron said:

Majin-Tenshinhan said:

outlawauron said:

Dark_Rulez89 said:

account2099 said:

N64 was more powerful then PS1. PS1 won.

Xbox was more powerful then PS2. PS2 won.

History has shown that the most powerful tech doesnt win because it usually leads to a higher price point. Sony was smart to make decent but not the best tech so it was mass market friendly and not as costly as optimizing for the more powerful consoles.

Now Sony seemingly spits in histories face with PS3. They make the most powerful tech and therefore have the highest asking price. To make it worse they came out a year after 360. I dont understand why Sony didnt stick to their winning formula.

My guess they thought the Bluray war was more important then video game market share, I dont know......

By your logic the Wii has this gen in the bag...Good to know

I think by everyone's logic, the Wii has this gen in the bag. (and for about a year now too)

@ Majin

I'm interested to see what he has to possibly back that up.

As am I. Though my guess is he'll just stop replying.

And it looks like you're right.

Do I get a cookie? :)

Take it and prosper.