TheSteve said:
tombi123 said:
TheSteve said:
tombi123 said:
kowenicki said:
@tombi
so 28% ps3 and 35% 360.... thats just not a big differenmce really is it.
Bioshsock on a simultaneous release would have been in the top 25 for PS3 too, so then it would be even closer.
Also PS3 didnt even get COD2 and this was a very early title on 360 that was lapped up through a desire for a shooter.... |
Bolded: How can you say this? In your OP you were comparing EXCLUSIVES.
Underlined: You could say the same for Resistance 1.
Red: I don't think thats garenteed, it would have to sell 1.27M copies. Bioshock came out when the PS3 had a tiny userbase (about 5M I think). It came out before the PS3 price cut in 2007.
|
But it didn't hit the PS3 until it had three times that...
|
But if you read what I was replying to, your comment doesn't matter.
|
D'jyou hit quote like an hour ago, and just get to posting it? I hit post before I was done with my thought, and corrected the post. My point was that with Bioshock releasing NOW, it should be doing better than it is.
That said, I didn't pick it up forever for the 360, because I wasn't impressed with the demo. I finally bought it when I saw it for $25, and I've only played it a handful of times. Like Gears of War, Resistance, and Killzone 2, it's really NOT all it's cracked up to be.
|
Well year old ports never do very well. And surely Bioshock's poor sales on PS3 only go against what the TC is trying to prove.
