How important is it to you PS3 beats 360 in console sales war?

[gergroy]

MikeB said:

@ Garnett

To quote devs:

"The disadvantage of Sony's [PSN] is that there isn't as much defined by Sony as to how you have to do things - they leave it very much up to you", "But at the same time, because it's not as strongly defined, you have the freedom to do it in the way that you want [on PSN] - in a way that may be more suitable to your game."

"Microsoft is only slowly increasing requirements and opening up the constraints of Xbox Live. It's been a slow process, whereas PSN hasn't been restricted by size"

"The hard drive is needed to store temporary data when playing online as the data transferred from one console to another requires storage space greater than what the memory card can contain."

Microsoft is a lot stricter and demands the usage of their less flexible protocols.

The size limit restrictions you are talking about is merely for xbl arcade games, not regular downloadable content which is what LBP content would be described as.  All of your quote are moot, because you are claiming that xbl couldn't take advantage of this kind of system.  Just like Sony, if microsoft wanted to do something like this, they could. 

Take Halo 3 for example, user generated maps and gametypes are shared millions of times a day.  I think that would definetly be considered user generated content. 

Your argument is silly, any kind of online content can be just as available on the 360 as the ps3.  Of course, now you will probably find some random blog entry and quote it out of context to try and prove me wrong, but it doesn't matter.  Because if you use your head, you really can't prove me wrong.  Microsoft could just as easily make a LBP type game and have user generated content, there isn't anything stopping them.