vaio said:
1. It was not about the profit it was about the owning rights, so you think by Sony making a CD drive they all of a sudden have the right to own Mario and zelda and so on? If you truly believe that then you must be stupid, Nintendo hired Sony to do the CD and in nno way should Sony have tried to get the owning rights to Nintendos properties and of course they should have been in on the profits made of the cd drive but that was not the case they tried to get all the rights of nintendos properties and thats the backstabbing Sony did and not the other way around. 2. Yes it was Nintendo´s fault that they lost (and even though I hated Sony really for what they did back then we got so many classic games out of it) but if they went with Sony´s backstabbing deal there wouldn´t be any Nintendo today because Sony would have own all their franchises and Sony would have killed both Nintendo and Sega at the same time. 3. Yes they did during their colaboration with both sega and nintendo they got to see classified information for both companies consoles wich they then in turn backstabbed bot ninty and sega and released the PS 1. 4. Nintendo wasn´t and isn´t in the CD buisness thats why they didn´t do that themselves, why did Sony steal tech from sega and Nintendo to do the PS 1 and not make an honest attempt by them selves instead of the stealing route they took? I am happy today that things went as they did even though I wasn´t back then because the games that has come out of this have been amazing wether it be from Sony or Nintendo but that is no excuse to forget the past and the truth about it. If you want to discuss this more then do you research and come back or else I won´t even bother replying to you as I am saying the same things over and over again.
|
When was Sony dealing with SEGA?? Can you please explain that







