Still don't understand why the N64 wasn't the #1 console of that gen?

[vaio]

BladeOfGod said:

vaio said:

BladeOfGod said:
Because Nintedo was dealing with Sony and than betrayed them and Sony launched their own console. Sony actually agreed to make CD drive for N64 but than Nintendo betrayed them and went to Philiphs. Sony was pissed off and they launched their own console. Nintendo shouldn't mess with Sony back than.


Don't you guys remember??

Get your facts straight Nintendo didn´t betray Sony, it was Sony trying to fuck Nintendo with a little clausul hidden in the contract that would give away all rights to games produced for the cd to Sony wich would mean that Sony would own all Nintendos IP´s by now if Nintendo didn´t back out of that deal.

Do your research and you will see it was Sony screwing over Nintendo by stealing the techinfo they got to see and used it in the PS 1 and not only that they did the same thing to Sega.

They combined the tech from both those companies and made PS 1 they didn´t even have a single idea for themselves untill PS 2 and got into the buisness by stealing and moneyhating.

 

 

 

1So, Sony should make CD drive for Nintendo console and NINTENDO SHOULD TAKE ALL THE PROFIT?????

2And Its only Nintendo's fault they lost 2 generations. If they didn't tuned to Philiphs they wouldn't get owned in next 2 gens.

 

3''Sony screwing over Nintendo by stealing the techinfo''

4That's why Nintendo turned to Sony and made them make CD drive for their console??? What a bad decision. Why didn't Nintendo made CD drives themselfes back than???

1. It was not about the profit it was about the owning rights, so you think by Sony making a CD drive they all of a sudden have the right to own Mario and zelda and so on?

If you truly believe that then you must be stupid, Nintendo hired Sony to do the CD and in nno way should Sony have tried to get the owning rights to Nintendos properties and of course they should have been in on the profits made of the cd drive but that was not the case they tried to get all the rights of nintendos properties and thats the backstabbing Sony did and not the other way around.

2. Yes it was Nintendo´s fault that they lost (and even though I hated Sony really for what they did back then we got so many classic games out of it) but if they went with Sony´s backstabbing deal there wouldn´t be any Nintendo today because Sony would have own all their franchises and Sony would have killed both Nintendo and Sega at the same time.

3. Yes they did during their colaboration with both sega and nintendo they got to see classified information for both companies consoles wich they then in turn backstabbed bot ninty and sega and released the PS 1.

4. Nintendo wasn´t and isn´t in the CD buisness thats why they didn´t do that themselves, why did Sony steal tech from sega and Nintendo to do the PS 1 and not make an honest attempt by them selves instead of the stealing route they took?

I am happy today that things went as they did even though I wasn´t back then because the games that has come out of this have been amazing wether it be from Sony or Nintendo but that is no excuse to forget the past and the truth about it.

If you want to discuss this more then do you research and come back or else I won´t even bother replying to you as I am saying the same things over and over again.