peanut1972 said:
Your not in California are you? Progressive Judges come up with some strange rulings as they breath new life into the meaning of words.
|
In point of fact, I am. And I even study California law for a living. And while I'll be the first to tell you that our courts have slipped in quality from their golden age, the basic rules of contract remain in place. Contract terms can only be nullified if they violate public policy, are unconscionable, or meet one of a few other narrow circumstances.
While you can try to take a stab at the latter, you'd lose, simply because courts assume that commercial parties enter into contracts with their eyes open, and there's nothing I can see here that rebuts that presumption. In fact, I'm highly skeptical that a court would find these terms unconscionable even if one of the parties was a common consumer, as the threshold for "unconscionable" remains pretty high. Additionally, there are other venues that developers can take, which is taken into account.
But this whole discussion is irrelevant, as I'm fairly certain that Nintendo's made sure that Washington law applies.