wfz said:
BMaker11 said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
BMaker11 said:
Kenology said:
lol! Dude, you just mindlessly post crap you perceive to be a knock to Nintendo/the Wii without even rationally processing or analyzing it first. You really are making yourself look desperate! |
I don't "mindlessly post crap". If you look across these forums, anytime 3rd party titles sales come into discussion about the Wii, it always results in "Game X may have sold poorly, but since it's on the Wii, it doesn't need to sell much to make a profit". I am sick of seeing it, and then came along this article, WHICH FOCUSES ON THE WORDS OF REGGIE FILS-AIME (you know, Nintendo of America) where he says "3rd party companies need to sell about a million copies in order to turn a profit".
This is what you call a source to an argument. Ninty fans believe low sales can turn a profit, I don't, and I have a source to back it up. How is citing your information "desperate"?
Edit: Slap yourself
|
Am I to understand that you think that, under no circumstances, can a Wii game be successful if it sold less than 1 million?
|
Certainly not. Stuff like Carnival Games and Game party could probably make a profit on 1 copy sold lol. But when you get to the likes of Samba de Amigo, House of the Dead, MadWorld, Zack and Wiki, NMH, De Blob, Trauma Center etc. selling 250-500k isn't going to cut it. Unless every time discussion about 3rd party games on the Wii revolves around crap like Hannah Montana or essentially anything from Ubisoft
|
Well, BMaker, you definitely had a good run going.
http://vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=1965557
Bye bye, now.
|
Notice how he says "on a PARTICULAR game"? I've already conceded that stuff like Hannah Montana and the likes most definitely do NOT need to make a million. But if you think something like MadWorld is profitable....at 70k, you're a fool