NanakiXI on 29 March 2009
| Khuutra said: If we did that, wouldn't the second opinion make it a communal score? At that point you're moving towards a law of averages rather than an actual, critical review. Let m ask you guys something: you're kind of referencing categorical scores that some big sites (namely IGN) use because you think that our categories, as they are now, are unclear. Would there be any way to alleviate this problem without just adding on more categories? |
Yes I see what you mean but it worked fine for old GameInformer (Sorry I say them so much but I grew up with the magazine). Maybe make a total score out of 20 or 30 kinda like Famitsu but that may be too much of an over hall.
Hard to say. I have grown up with these score systems so they seem mostly logical to me. Maybe someone else can come up with something better. As I stated just some ideas :P
FootballFan - "GT has never been bigger than Halo. Now do a comparison between the two attach ratios and watch GT get stomped by Halo. Reach will sell 5 million more than GT5. Quote me on it."
