blaydcor said:
Okay, a few things: 1) It would help if you could use your shift key. Really. A lot. Maybe spellcheck and a few more periods too. 2)It has been stated that fans shouldn't try to grasp for a cohesive Zelda timeline, as there really isn't one. The most plausible theories take into account multiple timelines. 3)There are not 'young' and 'adult' timelines. The general, logical consensus is that there are various incarnations of Link who generally have two games apeice, though if Spirit Tracks is indeed WW timeline then we'll have 3. 4)These various Links and their respective timelines, for the most part, have no concrete way of being chronologically measured up against each other. Treat 'em as seperate and ineffectual on each other if you don't have solid proof of their order. 5)See that part I bolded? Wrong. The Link of Legend is called the Hero of Time througout Wind Waker, not to mention (more importantly), TWILIGHT PRINCESS DID NOT EXIST WHEN WIND WAKER CAME OUT. WW Link is one of the few Link's whose timeline can be gauged against any other Link's; namely, the OoT/MM timeline, although even this is only heavily intimated, not explicitly stated in the games.
|
1.whats the shift key for???
2.making timelines and woving the story together is fun, and a good way to add depht to a no so deep story
3.yes, and watch the timeline i made, all of them are diferent links and 2 games a piece(small compilation:1.LOZ, AOL. 2.ALTTP,LA 3. OOT, MM 4. OOA, OOS 5. WW, PH. 6. MC is independent. 7. FSA is independent 8.TP is independent as of now)
4.nintendo has stated there is a timeline, wheter this is true or not is not of my matters
5.i have a crap load of zelda, that i didn't remember that is of little importance and who knows, maybe TP was in plannig stages when WW was made so if theres a clear story and is told in a non linear way, they can make refercnes to games that haven't come out, cause they eventually will, but your right, i messed up








