By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JaggedSac said:
vlad321 said:
JaggedSac said:

I know what you have posted previously and I disagree.

Give me sales figures of DE1 and I will tell you why they might want to make the game more paletable to a wider audience.  They would have done this regardless of going to consoles or not.  More graphically impressive a game is, the more money it costs, the more they need to make back.

Not sure how taking out some questionable actions in FO2 makes a game more dumbed down.  Does being able to murder children make a more complex game?

I told you. I still remember my surprise when I was playing as a bad char when I tried to shoot the annoying fucks in Little town, but the game didn't let me. Of course that's just an example. Just can't do as much.

 

So, if they had not made the game for consoles, they would have changed their game design, and those kids would be ready for the picking, and that would have made the game more complex?

I just don't get it.

 

 

Indeed, another one right off the top of my head. I was tight on caps for the longest time, and tried to prostitute myself. No such luck in FO3. It's a lot of things like that that add up to the game being less fun. It's not a bad game, just not as good.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835