Riot Of The Blood said:
Khuutra said:
Riot Of The Blood said:
Khuutra said:
Riot Of The Blood said: VGchartz entire review system is bias and favors Nintendo and other Japanese games.
I would think that it's obvious...
|
You realize there's more than one of us. Right?
|
Yes sir.
On the other hand, you do realize that my criticism isn't directed toward any reviewer here, right?
|
The point of my previous was not that you were referring to one reviewer, it is that you were referring to a review "system" as if this somehow manages to encompass the tendencies of every reviewer. That's ludicrous.
|
I think you're missing my point, Khuutra.
I like the reviewer here. So much so, that I often ask through PM about certain games and it even impacts my purchase. My criticsims has nothing at all -- not a single thing -- to do with the people reviewing these games. I'm speaking out purely on how the scores for games are determined and how the sytem clearly favors Japanese genres. Even if I were reviewing games, I could think of many games that I thought deserved 9/10 that actually end up in the mid 80% range. This is because of how the scores are dictated.
To sum it up: The text part of the reviews are fine, it's the scoring system that needs work.
|
The... the scoring system favors Japanese games?
...Huh.
Okay, I'm going to put aside all presuppositions abou this for a second. I've been unable to see this kind of thing before.
How does that work?