| Oyvoyvoyv said: Wait, so you think that developers try to create reviewer's claim?
Do you honestly think that more than 1/10 who bought Twilight Princess thought of it not being a "original Zelda"?
Well, I'll give you one thing. You were correct in your original post. You said " it would mean the major players in the industry hadn't learned anything."
They didn't learn anything, because there was nothing to be learned. They had it right from the beginning. Porting to Wii was a better idea than to make a game from the ground up to it.
I'm not sure if the same is still the case, but it will be for the Wii 2's first year.
You can't say that the major players messed up because 10,000 people on the gaming sites on the net wanted an "original" version of the game. (Of course, that number would differ from game to game).
And yes Zack "he" is not an idiot. We're using Wii 2 as a placeholder (obviously). |
Well when i made the statement regarding it was as one of those 10 000 people that hang out on game sites;) and yes i while we can expect companies to try to make money i don't want to be seeing port after port at the expense of new and original games.
People seem to accept ports as being part of the Wii's place in the industry, and maybe it is, but what would happen if it started happening on all next generation systems?(i mean the 720, PS4 Wii2 etc) Certainly for the industry to be healthy companies need to make money but creativity and original ideas are what keep the industry moving forward.
Anway, my original comment was admittedly and intentionally from a very selfish point of view and i never meant it in a fiscal sense.
