Dark Chaos said:
darthdevidem01 said:
Dark Chaos said:
darthdevidem01 said:
Dark Chaos said:
darthdevidem01 said: I won't feed the troll above me
but I will say one thing
if PS3 is considered a huge failure by you....then many previous console makers who launched at $600 would long for such a failure to happen to their consoles |
Thats like saying if Microsoft released their next OS for $1000. Will it fail? Yes, but it will still sell more than others who have released at that price.
OR
If APPLE released their next IPOD for $400. Will it sell. Hell yea but they will tremendously lose ground and probably not be market leader bt will still sell.
SONY on the other hand are in a much worse position as they are also losing money
|
All I'm saying is that PS3.....the console that will be the highest selling 3rd place console or even 2nd can't be called a failure
you are making it out to be some huge failure
|
So if APPLE released their latest IPOD nano for $400. Went from 75% market share to 25% and is third place or even second. You wouldnt call that a huge failure???
It will also be the highest sell 2nd or 3rd place mp3 player
|
no i would call that a blunder....a mistake
NOT a failure
a Failure would = discontinuing PS3.......very low 3rd part support......very low SW sales......very low HW sales n so on
|
This would have happened had it not been for the PS1/2 $ savings.
|
so?
did it happen whatever the reason.....no
so PS3 isn't a failure
_______
if PS3 & 360 were launched as they were below cost.....by some company instead of a cash powerhouse like SONY or MS then that company would be bankrupt now.
so can we suddenly say...oh 360 was a failure to
hell no!