Khuutra said:
Refer to my sig sir. More seriously, I'm going to bet that there's a lot more thought going into the decision than naz is letting on. I don't mean to imply anything sinister, of course, just that his criteria are actually higher than he's implying. I'm willing to bet that a moderator has to be someone who contributes to the site itself in a retty big way, not just someone who posts a lot in the forums, so that you've already proven your dedication to VGChartz above and beyond your personal connection to the community. That way you can ensure a degree of loyalty and even-handedness that you wouldn't get out of the average member, regardless of how clean their record is. This is just a guess, of course. |
I would except that when I am at work I turn off sigs in the forums because it slows down my work PC.
As for everything else, yes that is most likely how it works. To be honest the whole "past moderations" thing is the first time I have heard it being used as criteria.
For example when I use to frequent a different gaming site dedicated to consoles, handhelds and homebrew applications I was onced warned for linking to ROMS that someone needed, not knowing it was not allowed. I was warned and told if it happened again I was to be banned.
To make a long story short I was bored and decided to make a thread, I worked so hard on it and updated it weekly. It had all homebrew released for the PSP, emulator, apps, etc... my thread grew fast to the point where it had around 200-300+ programs on it. Eventually majority were added to a new section of the site, a Download section.
I was then asked to join the moderation staff, regardless of the fact that I had a prior moderation.
So I would say yes, it has much more to do with your contributions to the site and not just whether or not you follow the rules.
iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.
Currently playing:
Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)

![]()








