Zucas said:
outlawauron said:
Hephaestos said:
outlawauron said:
Hephaestos said:
that really looks like they want to hurt the game.... 3.9 is very low on IGN.
I'm pretty sure you had a random character instead of sonic, the score would have been 6.9 and not 3.9. The guy seems angry at the speed of the game not being sonic speed...
... and he sure does hate "waggle"... why does this guy even review wii games?? |
Because there is a difference between intuitive, well thought and well done motino controls and tacked on waggle.
|
true, but the term waggle is not really used by fans of intuitive, well though and well done motion controls... it's more used by wii haters.
That said, he would not coment on it if those controls were as you say intitive, etc...
|
If I were reviewing the game, and the wii controls weren't any good. I would do readers wrong by not pointing that out.
|
Doesn't seem to stop reviewers on games off of the Wii haha. You know what I'm talking about. But oh come on dude your just agreeing with Matt because ya got a thing against the Wii.
My problem with the review, though isn't the score, but the way it was presented. Shouldn't be about Matt's ideal Sonic game not being present but how the game actually is. Can't get that from this review. All you get from this review is a grown man whining.
|
What? I agree with Matt just because you say I'm biased? Couldn't I turn it around saying that you disagree because I think you're biased? That's just stupid.
And I haven't said I've agreed. I just think it's funny that people are so selective in which reviews they listen to.
