wfz said:
Torillian said:
sc94597 said:
outlawauron said: I'm not interested due to HVS not making a good game yet (even Guerilla made the excellent Killzone: Liberation) and for it missing features that I think are necessary in a FPS. |
According to wikipedia they developed 7 games 75%+ review average, two of which with over 80% one at 81 the other at 85. I'm not sure what your standards are but I'm pretty sure that anything in the 80s is accepted as good by reviewers, and I personally liked games in 60s. Now of course you could say reviews aren't always accurate and I don't know if the games are actually good without playing them, but the same could be said for you as well. That is unless you played every game developed by HVS.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Voltage_Software
according to Wikipedia they have developed a plethora of games and their average isn't 75%, but I instead calculate it to 62.91% average.
|
I think you misunderstood him. He said that they developed 7 games that had a 75% or higher review average, two of which were over 80%, 81% and 85% being the exact value of those two. The other 5 were between 75% and 79%
It feels really weird repeating what sc said almost verbatim, but hopefully you understand it this time. You probably just read over it a bit too fast the first time. :P
|
ohh....read the inflection wrong. thought he was saying that was all of their games and the average of them was 75. I need to read more closely before putting work into a post like that. c'est la vie.