Currently Online 
| Kwaidd said: (vagabond) "Furthermore it's insulting to the wii. Instead of getting a genuine full length adventure it's getting another "pick up and play" title that can be beat in a sitting. It's like saying "no, no, no. The wii can't handle a third person shooter." So, you and the whiners on this board know exactly what this game is and isn't already, without seeing or playing it and can fill the rest of us in on how its going to suck...and that EA are lazy tools. Well, thanks so much for the enlightenment from all of you. I wish the other hopefuls and myself had your foresight to know all this before the game gets a chance to prove itself one way or the other, so we could bitch too. how rediculous. the whole immediate "oh, its on rails?!? then it sucks" frame of mind really takes the cake too. Like a really well done rails game with new ideas and direction would never be able to say, be kick ass, or earn game of the year...just because. pitiful - kw
|
You point fingers at people making assumptions based on little to no knowledge of the game and the concept behind, yet; what is this? Assumptions based on little to no knowledge of the game and the concept behind?
Just had to point that out, when having a go at the more eloquent users such as vagabond, it might be a good idea to build an argument that doesn't build on the exact same premise as the one you're trying to deflate, someone might notice...
