Bong Lover said:
RukiSame, I leave you to ponder this about what is the real game industry: The Wii includes a virtual console that let's people play old classic games, this feature alone is a greater feature for any real gamer than anything offered by either the 360 or the PS3. In my opinion, even if Nintendo hadn't revolutionized the controler, by splitting it in two, they would still be the obvious choice for anybody primarily interested in games. For media hub fanatics though, I can see how they would not be too interested in buying a gaming machine when what they want is a media center. I say thank you to Nintendo, for stepping up and not letting Sony and Microsoft kill off gaming completely. |
Lets not forget all those dirty causal PS3 owners who bought ther system to watch BR movies. Shocking isnt it, the though that some people buy a Wii to play tennis, who gives a shit.
Bong lover has priorities sorted, Bongs and Jesus FTW
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.