exindguy said:
If your entire argument hinged on the success (or lack thereof) of Z&W as prima facie evidence against the viability of 'core' titles on Wii, you probably need a new argument so don't let it go to your head.
|
You see that part where I put "as an example". That means that that one instance isn't necessarily representative of everything, but is a factor in said argument. I didn't say "because Zack and Wiki sold poorly, the Wii doesn't sell core games", I always said "The Wii barely sells core games, just at games the like of Zack and Wiki", to which Wii fans would shout "What're you talking about? It did well for what it was/it made a profit/etc." Now, this is showing that those statements were obviously wrong.








