Batman...WTF? said:
The point was Playstation lost 3 exclusives it should've had in the bag. |
The point is that the PS3 is bringing in more revenue(and a good chance more profit) with less 3rd party exclusives AND a much smaller userbase. If you want to bring that up bring it up in a thread about sony fanboys boasting about their game catalogue, not a thread about 3rd party revenues. It only makes the PS3 look even better and third party developers moronic for even thinking of abandoning the console.
@ Groucho I totally agree with you. It's pretty amazing and speaks volumes about the profitability from developing for the PS3 over other systems.
Also no one has mentioned about game prices. I think I may have mentioned it before in previous threads, but XBOX 360 games seem to go on sale or have a price drop more often than PS3 games. Though the gap is closing compared to the first year the PS3 was out, when very rarely did a game go on sale. But I think the fact that PS3 owners on average would have a bigger wallet(it doesn't mean your poor if you have a 360 but at such a high price point for a PS3 a lot of the poorer gamers cant afford it) and game less frequently(atleast here in America) it let's Sony keep the game prices higher than that of the 360. And by having higher prices on average, you'd sell less games but bring in more revenue. Not necessarily more revenue than the 360, but more revenue than if they pursued a lower price point strategy. But in this case, also more revenue than the 360.