By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
madskillz said:
Ajescent said:
I can live with Bethesda saying no DLC for the ps3, what I want to raise an eyebrow at are the one who seemingly refuse to believe money changed hands somewhere.

In this book and I'll find the link, R* approached MS with an offer - R was offering GTA III and on as timed exclusives - for free - on the original Xbox. MS said they couldn't be associated with the controversial game. R went to Sony with the same offer. Sony accepted.

What would you do if you found out MS got the DLC for free, just for asking? What if it is just that simple?

Lemme dig up that link to the book ...

 

 

Hmm, interesting, since PS2 exclusives have always been used around here as "Sony is evil, too" counters when people get pissed off about MS buying JRPG exclusivity.

I posted the link. It's just a cycle, fueled by the folks who want what they can't have.

I didn't want to buy a PS2, but wanted to play GTA III. So, I didn't complain - I just bought a PS2. Whiners are hella annoying and really make me sick. Just say 'I wish it was on the PS3' and move on. Dwelling, whining and complaining constantly really just makes the loser look even worse.