noname2200 on 19 January 2009
| Erik Aston said: And btw... I don't know if I have ever seen so much garbage number crunching and faulty faux-analysis in one thread before. |
If that was directed at me...sorry! I'll be the first to admit that my stats skills are rusty. Care to point out the errors, so I can improve?
Edit: For example, I'm still trying to decipher what Mr.Stickball was getting at in his last post in relation to the question it's addressing, i.e. "(b)ut only if we assume even distribution of sales between all the "have-nots." Is there any reason we should do so?" Care to help?
