celine said:
I understand what you say but I think you miss the important point here.
Take the definition of "Revolution" : a fundamental change in the way of thinking about or visualizing something : a change of paradigm A common competition would be that one company try to be better than another one in the same contest. The current situation in the gaming industry is that one company decided that a change of the way of thinking was due because they believed that a safe, common and incremental approach was unfeasble in the long term. In a common competition a company PR will try to spin that his company is better than the others but in a competition of different system/model of values who is part of one system will try to spin that his system is the right one whereas the other system is wrong and destined to failure. In our case there is one company that has adopted a new way of thinking while other two company follow the common way of thinking. What Nintendo is affirming with those PR is that their ideological choice was the right one whereas the obsolete paradigm , adopted by the other two companies, is destined to failure or stagnation.
|
Yes i did understand what you were meaning in the first place and i agree to that. Nintendos PR so far has been in the light of their businessmodel anyway (which of course is the only thing that means anything to them). But looking at the market, which companies had success and which didn't, the set may change. In he end, in practise we are arguing about semantics, since no matter how do you want to look at it, Nintendo did contribute most to the growth.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.