dolemit3 said:
Because the Wii owners, unlike the PS3 owners don't care less for JRPGs. Mario games only for them. |
Haven't you noticed why DMJ had to include the "HD" JRPG as a conditional?
| Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors | ![]() |
Square Enix | 0.50m | |||||
| Pokemon Batoru Reboryūshon | ![]() |
Nintendo | 0.31m | |||||
| Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World | ![]() |
Namco Bandai | 0.22m |
WKC has yet to top any of these. It will overtake the Tales spinoff next week, but lifetime against Pokemon should be close. It doesn't have a chance at the Dragon Quest spinoff.
Big name JRPG's on the Wii will sell, period. Have we already forgotten the announcement that DQX is arriving on the Wii? edit: Forgot to mention MH3. Only Mario on the Wii, right?
OT: Sales are a little better than I expected, not bad. Still, the PS3 hasn't quite yet proven it can sell JRPG's better than the 360 worldwide, which was the argument (I thought) some of the "Xbots" claimed, one I agree with. As for people calling Square-Enix idiots for putting their games on the 360, I'm not sure what to think... if you're implying WKC showed the PS3 is a more viable JRPG platform, I suggest looking at the Wii's DQ spinoff, which opened at 310k first week over a year ago.











