By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vlad321 said:
arsenicazure said:
@VLad..

Sadly, the wii costs $250 and therefore " by my logic" its still 50 bucks more than the cheapest 360 and doesnt qualify as "better"..

Its very easy to make pretty pictures.. but unfortunately games are "moving pictures" that require minimum 30 FPS to be enjoyable. If crysis needs a $1500 PC to make it pretty and if you think that makes sense.. good for you..

meanwhile, the rest of us enjoy our low performance ps3's and 360's. While you can play the crysis slideshow on your PC

 

Yeah, I guess it is 50 bucks more expensive, however it wasn't so for 2 years, and even now people are STILL buying their HDDs fo the 360, driving up the cost. Your argument is, yeah the PC looks better but it costs more. My argument is, yeah the HDs look better but also cost more. I really can't help you any more if you don't see any irony in that (I find it HILARIOUS when HD fanboys start bitching about prices of a PC as the only defense against the PC while at the same time bitching out the Wii with the exact same words the PCers bitched them out).

 

yes becoz since a year the arcade has been on par with the wii ($250) and the previous year was $50 more expensive. As opposed to a quality PC that costs several times over the cost of an xbox 360 ,$50 is a "huge amount"

Secondly, the wii nor the 360 require HDD's to play games- its an optional addon for 360

 



Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.

owner of : atari 2600, commodore 64, NES,gameboy,atari lynx, genesis, saturn,neogeo,DC,PS2,GC,X360, Wii

5 THINGS I'd like to see before i knock out:

a. a AAA 3D sonic title

b. a nintendo developed game that has a "M rating"

c. redesgined PS controller

d. SEGA back in the console business

e. M$ out of the OS business