arsenicazure said:
yea.. 399 for the HDD enabled xbox.. still cheaper than a PC. Your clearly missing the point of my argument. PC's ARE better graphically.because the hardware evolves every few months. As for crysis being all pretty. yes its awesome. But how powerful of a system do you need to play it at those beaut settings: Here is a toms hardware article about building a "budget"gaming PC for a fairly cheap(for PC standards) $625. How did crysis score at 1080P: around 20FPS(overclocked).. without AA http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-graphics-overclocking,2082.html
And a $1250+ PC ( thats the price of SIX XBOX 360 arcades): http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-graphics-overclocking,2083-12.html Thats 30 FPS at 1080P
this is no excuse for consoles developed in 2005 to having "inferior" graphics.. if your gonna compare a 2005 BMW 5 series to a 2008 BMW M6 its common sense on which one is gonna trump at performance. But as the toms hardware article shows. even PC's above $1200 can barely manage to run crysis at those postcard perfect settings.
|
Any Wii owenr can say the exact same shit when you start throwing a fit over graphics and processing power. So I'm guessing by your logic, since the HD consoles are ultiamtely better than the PC, the Wii is better than the HD consoles.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








