By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Riachu said:
SamuelRSmith said:
Ubisoft paid for Haze, not Free Radical. The only problem Haze could cause is problems with getting other publisher's to sign the dotted line for their future games.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure when the developer and publishers of a game are seperate, it's the latter that pays for development of the game, right?

 

 

It depends greatly on the game. Free Radical in particular was known for self-financing to a great degree, so that they could retain the IP rather than the publisher. I'd be surprised if the majority of the development money for Haze didn't come from Free Radical.