Max King of the Wild on 18 December 2008
| PalmiNio said: Well percentage is they way to go. And since the numbers is not 100% accurate the difference falls easily within the error margin. In medicine you can have a 95% certainty on some test so in this type case it is not far off. The reality can be over double and under double but the margins clearly predicts that the double mark is statistically good. In this kind of predictions +/- 15% is acceptable so it is nearly. Working on market reseach so it is fun to spin with number. It is a way to lie without actualy lying. |
error margin wouldt be nearly 100k. hate to break it to you. oh and the OP probablly wasnt sitting there going "hmmm... if ioi was 15% off of his 360 numbers blah bl;ah blah blah"
