| lombard2578 said: You don't know about what you speak. First, you see at vgchartz the world numbers instead of seeing the NA numbers, which are not only US numbers (they include Canada and Mexico and South america, so must be higher as US numbers). Second, the US numbers of npd you speak, concern this period: 8 july/ 4 august, so you speak about bad weeks. The good weeks are those ending 14, 21, 28 july and 4 august Third, you don't have seen these news: http://www.vgchartz.com/news/news.php?id=510 which must be the first action you must do before posting what you have posting. (comparison between npd numbers and vgchartz numbers) Fourth, you ignore that: http://www.vgchartz.com/welcome.php which learn you: VG Chartz verifies the accuracy of sell-through data by comparing with manufacturer production and shipment data and also by comparing with competing sell-through services, if available. By constantly adjusting sell-through data and adopting a multifaceted approach, we can present information that is as unbiased, accurate and as complete as possible. which say you that the NA numbers for July (the 4 week i speak before) will be adjusted the next week, for beeing better. So, before posting for your first post, you must see the website better, don't imagine that one body (ioi), can be a magician against a big organisation which has a lot of money to do this job. I hope to help you to better understand, and the other new Vgchartz user, which don't understand good, how vgchartz do for his website. Thanks for reading that. You are not the first. |
I'm rather surprised by how defensive this response is. I was simply asking a question in which I clearly stated that I must be reading it wrong (i.e. already admitting I could be at fault).
Thanks for the info, but the tone was rather uncalled for.
